Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Lightest1,576 kg3,474 lb
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 2,027kg4,469lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has 125 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Is 451 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Has 125 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























