Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,269 km789 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,285kg5,038lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 124.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,269km789mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,861mm191in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 148mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 4,180-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,269 km 789 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,269 km 789 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Is 54 kg lighter
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 169 km (105 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























