Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 102 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Is 789 kg lighter
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 245 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























