Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,526kg3,364lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 943km586mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,451mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,836mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,632L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 4,180-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 943 km 586 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 943 km 586 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Is 24 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























