Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk611 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range943 km586 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 943km586mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,451mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,836mm112in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 611L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 1,632L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 943 km 586 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIII Variant2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 943 km 586 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 21 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Arteon Shooting Brake Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 229 km (142 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























