AUDI A7 Sportback (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,370 km851 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 138.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,370km851mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,581mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 563L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 3,750-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 4,180-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI has 14 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
Although AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,370 km 851 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.8 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,370 km 851 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
- Is 234 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























