Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Most powerful315 hp235 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 2,027kg4,469lb |
| Gross weight | 2,285kg5,038lb | 2,590kg5,710lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 124.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.8s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,269km789mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 148mm6in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.8 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh has 125 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: 1.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 2,027 kg 4,469 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,269 km 789 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Is 447 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60 60 kWh
- Has 125 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























