Car comparison

Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2013-2015
VS

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    595 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,526 kg
    3,364 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,100 km
    684 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,526kg3,364lb
Gross weight
2,103kg4,636lb
2,130kg4,696lb
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
127.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
127.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
37.1s
Calculated
37.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton
Calculated
210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
759km472mi
Calculated
1,100km684mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,833mm190in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,518mm60in
1,581mm62in
Ground clearance-
138mm5in
Trunk volume
595L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,700L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI-1,700-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI4,180-6,000 rpm1,500-4,180 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.1 s
37.5 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,526 kg
3,364 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI7.7 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI7.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
759 km
472 mi
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,100 km
684 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.7 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.7 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.7 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,526 kg
3,364 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,833 mm
190.3 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
759 km
472 mi
1,100 km
684 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
-
Trunk score
595 L
21.0 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 32 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 14 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
70 70 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI vs Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster