Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Skoda Superb II · Facelift 2013 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk595 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,576kg3,474lb |
| Gross weight | 2,103kg4,636lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 39.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km472mi Calculated | 1,404km873mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,833mm190in | 4,862mm191in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,837mm112in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 595L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | - | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 39.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 759 km 472 mi |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIFacelift 20132.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 472 mi | 1,404 km 873 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 595 L 21.0 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb II Facelift 2013 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 645 km (401 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 56 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























