Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V90 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,497 kg3,300 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Gross weight | 2,063kg4,548lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 85.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.6s Calculated | 41.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 158g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.6 s | 41.3 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 8.9 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T4 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T4 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | VolvoV902.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,785 kg 3,935 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,078 km 670 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 158 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Volvo V90 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 288 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 270 km (168 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
- Has 6 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























