Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,465 kg
    3,230 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    130 hp/t
    97 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,497kg3,300lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,063kg4,548lb
2,055kg4,530lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
66.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
32.6s
Calculated
31.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,078km670mi
Calculated
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,689mm185in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,452mm57in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
48L
CO2 emissions-
129g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.6 s
31.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
224 km/h
139 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
1,078 km
670 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
980 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.7 s
224 km/h
139 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.7 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
7.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,497 kg
3,300 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,452 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,078 km
670 mi
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
-
129 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
130 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 99 km (61 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 32 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI vs Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster