Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,063kg4,548lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.6s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,078km670mi Calculated | 980km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.6 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 980 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,078 km 670 mi | 980 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 99 km (61 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























