Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
RS 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,497kg3,300lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,063kg4,548lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 137 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























