Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0vsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
RS 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,497kg3,300lb |
| Gross weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 2,063kg4,548lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 71.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.9s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,067km663mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.9 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.7 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,067 km 663 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 47 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























