BMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320dvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best estimated range1,067 km663 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 2,255kg4,971lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 816km507mi Calculated | 1,067km663mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,709mm185in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,827mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,851mm112in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,573mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,567mm62in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 816 km 507 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 816 km 507 mi | 1,067 km 663 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 320d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 250 km (156 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























