Car comparison

Volvo V90 2.0 T4vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V90

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    132 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,320 km
    820 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Volvo V90 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    106 hp/t
    79 kW/t
    9.4 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV902.0 T4JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,785kg3,935lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,300kg5,071lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
219 km/h
136 mph
To 99% top speed
85.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
87.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
41.2s
Calculated
42.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
168Nm/t112lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
809km503mi
Calculated
1,320km820mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,936mm194in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,475mm58in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance-
116mm5in
Trunk volume
560L
565L
Max trunk volume-
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
66L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
132g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V90 2.0 T4Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Volvo V90 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV902.0 T45,000 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV902.0 T4JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.2 s
42.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
219 km/h
136 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.3 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.9 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
142 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo V90 2.0 T4 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
1,785 kg
3,935 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
219 km/h
136 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T48.9 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d8.9 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Volvo V90 2.0 T4: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T4
809 km
503 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,320 km
820 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV902.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
219 km/h
136 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV902.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
219 km/h
136 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV902.0 T4
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.9 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV902.0 T4
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV902.0 T4JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
219 km/h
136 mph
Lightness
1,785 kg
3,935 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
809 km
503 mi
1,320 km
820 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
132 g/km
Trunk score
560 L
19.8 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V90 2.0 T4Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km8.75 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi14.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal750 L198 US gal165 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,313 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V90 2.0 T4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 511 km (318 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V90 2.0 T4
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI ultra
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TDI ultra
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0 T4
520d
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 T4
2.0d
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T4
1.8 TSI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T4vsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
2.0d
1.6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsSubaruLevorg1.6
Volvo V90 2.0 T4 vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster