Subaru Levorg
Car comparison
Subaru Levorg 1.6vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions132 g/km
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,576 kg3,474 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLevorg1.6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 87.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 42.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 159Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,600cc98cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 522L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,446L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Levorg 1.6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLevorg1.6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 42.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Subaru Levorg 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru Levorg 1.6 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 8.9 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 8.9 s |
Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d has more power, Subaru Levorg 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 845 km 525 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 1,320 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLevorg1.6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 522 L 18.4 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Levorg 1.6 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Is 194 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 475 km (295 mi) more estimated range
- Has 43 L more trunk volume
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























