Subaru Levorg
Car comparison
Subaru Levorg 1.6vsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions115 g/km
- Best estimated range1,091 km678 mi
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score95/100
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Largest trunk522 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLevorg1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 43.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 159Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 1,091km678mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,600cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 522L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,446L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 115g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Levorg 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLevorg1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 43.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Subaru Levorg 1.6 has 20 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 8.9 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 8.5 s |
Although Subaru Levorg 1.6 has more power, Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 845 km 525 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 1,091 km 678 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLevorg1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 1,091 km 678 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 115 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 522 L 18.4 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Levorg 1.6 | Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 162 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 216 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 246 km (153 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 49 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























