Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5vsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2019
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI380

220 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    235 hp
    175 kW
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
235hp175kW
220hp164kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,051kg4,522lb
1,715kg3,781lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
82.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
83.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
38.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,183km735mi
Calculated
775km482mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,668mm66in
-
Rear track
1,673mm66in
-
Ground clearance
216mm9in
-
Trunk volume
505L
463L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
62L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,740-2,220 rpm5,000 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3804,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
38.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 15 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
1,715 kg
3,781 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3807.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
775 km
482 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
220 hp
164 kW
7.5 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI380
Power
235 hp
175 kW
220 hp
164 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
2,051 kg
4,522 lb
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
1,183 km
735 mi
775 km
482 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 408 km (254 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 42 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380

  • Is 336 kg lighter
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI380 - car comparison - FastVsFaster