Car comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 B4

197 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    211 km/h
    131 mph
  • Lightest
    1,843 kg
    4,063 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    103 hp/t
    77 kW/t
    9.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Most powerful
    197 hp
    147 kW
  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    155 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,203 km
    748 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
190hp142kW
197hp147kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,843kg4,063lb
1,950kg4,299lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
-
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
82.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
48.2s
Calculated
66.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
870km540mi
Calculated
1,203km748mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,882mm74in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
191mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
650L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,065L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
71L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4PowerTorque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B44,000 rpm1,740-2,760 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.2 s
66.6 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has 7 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,950 kg
4,299 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
211 km/h
131 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI7.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B48.3 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has more power, Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
870 km
540 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
1,203 km
748 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.5 s
211 km/h
131 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
197 hp
147 kW
8.3 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.3 s
Top speed
211 km/h
131 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,843 kg
4,063 lb
1,950 kg
4,299 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
870 km
540 mi
1,203 km
748 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

  • Is 107 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 145 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 334 km (207 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0 B4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 B4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 B4
2.5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 B4
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 TSI
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 TSI
GLB 220d
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.0 B4
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster