Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIvsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range870 km540 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,733 kg3,821 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,843kg4,063lb | 1,733kg3,821lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,520kg5,556lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.2s Calculated | 49.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 870km540mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,574mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 191mm8in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 230L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,065L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.2 s | 49.1 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 870 km 540 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,843 kg 4,063 lb | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 870 km 540 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 420 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























