Skoda Karoq
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range1,038 km645 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,647kg3,631lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.8s Calculated | 53.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,038km645mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,382mm173in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,607mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 176mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.8 s | 53.7 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 1,038 km 645 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,038 km 645 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 220 km (136 mi) more estimated range
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























