Skoda Karoq
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score93/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,055 km655 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.8s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.9s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,038km645mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,382mm173in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,607mm63in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 176mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 521L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.9 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 1,038 km 645 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroq2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,038 km 645 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq 2.0 TDI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























