Subaru Levorg
Car comparison
Subaru Levorg 1.6vsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,222 kg2,694 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions116 g/km
- Best estimated range1,020 km634 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score94/100
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk522 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruLevorg1.6 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,222kg2,694lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 69.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 159Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 845km525mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,600cc98cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,490mm59in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,514mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 522L | 482L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,446L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru Levorg 1.6: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 4,800-5,600 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruLevorg1.6 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Subaru Levorg 1.6 has 20 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,222 kg 2,694 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 8.9 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 8.2 s |
Although Subaru Levorg 1.6 has more power, Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Subaru Levorg 1.6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 845 km 525 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruLevorg1.6 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruLevorg1.6 | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,222 kg 2,694 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 845 km 525 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 522 L 18.4 cu ft | 482 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru Levorg 1.6 | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru Levorg 1.6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Is 354 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 48 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























