Seat Leon X-Perience
Car comparison
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSIvsSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,222 kg2,694 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions116 g/km
- Best estimated range1,020 km634 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,222kg2,694lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 69.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.7s Calculated | 38.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,543mm179in | 4,549mm179in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,481mm58in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,503mm59in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 482L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 150g/km | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.7 s | 38.7 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI has 30 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,222 kg 2,694 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20161.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,222 kg 2,694 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 150 g/km | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 482 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 1.4 TSI
- Is 264 kg lighter
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























