Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.7s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,296km805mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 422L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.7 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI has 10 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,296 km 805 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 450 km (280 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 29 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























