Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDIvsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best performance score48/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,296 km805 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,515kg3,340lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.7s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 36.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,207km750mi Calculated | 1,296km805mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 422L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,354L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 36.7 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,207 km 750 mi |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 1,296 km 805 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,207 km 750 mi | 1,296 km 805 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TDI
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 89 km (56 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























