Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTECvsSeat Exeo 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,207 km750 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,161km721mi Calculated | 1,207km750mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,199cc134cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705mm106in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 464L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 180 hp 134 kW |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC has 10 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 8.7 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
Although Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC has more power, Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 1,161 km 721 mi |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,207 km 750 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,161 km 721 mi | 1,207 km 750 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC | Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























