Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Honda Accord VIII · Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTECvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.6 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk464 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.5s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,161km721mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,199cc134cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,725mm186in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705mm106in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 464L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 4,000 rpm | 2,000-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.5 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 180 hp 134 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 8.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 and Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 1,161 km 721 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | HondaAccord VIIIFacelift 20112.2 i-DTEC | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.6 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,161 km 721 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 464 L 16.4 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Honda Accord VIII Facelift 2011 2.2 i-DTEC
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.6 T4
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























