Seat Exeo
Car comparison
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDIvsHyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Sonata VI (YF)
2.4 GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,207 km750 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk523 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,458kg3,214lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 33.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,207km750mi Calculated | 875km544mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,359cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,820mm190in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,795mm110in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,597mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 523L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 191g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 6,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 33.6 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 201 hp 150 kW |
Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI has 31 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 1,458 kg 3,214 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 8.5 s |
Although Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI has more power, Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,207 km 750 mi |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 875 km 544 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 201 hp 150 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | HyundaiSonata VI (YF)2.4 GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,458 kg 3,214 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,207 km 750 mi | 875 km 544 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 191 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 523 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI | Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 3 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 332 km (206 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Sonata VI (YF) 2.4 GDI
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 63 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























