Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,207 km750 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best economy score91/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,075kg4,575lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.8s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 1,207km750mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,666mm184in | 4,661mm184in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 422L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,354L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 179g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.8 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 909 km 565 mi |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 1,207 km 750 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | SeatExeo2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 1,207 km 750 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 179 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Exeo 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 298 km (185 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























