Roewe i6
Car comparison
Roewe i6 1.5 TvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.5 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk467 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Roewei61.5 T | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 169hp126kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,533kg3,380lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 763km474mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,490cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,835mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 467L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 68L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Roewei61.5 T | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 17 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Roewe i6 1.5 T and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Roewe i6 1.5 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Roewei61.5 T | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 169 hp 126 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 763 km 474 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Roewe i6 1.5 T | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 263 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 401 km (249 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























