Roewe i6
Car comparison
Roewe i6 1.5 TvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk467 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Roewei61.5 T | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 169hp126kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 34.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 763km474mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,490cc91cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,671mm184in | 4,458mm176in |
| Width | 1,835mm72in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,637mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 114mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 467L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 880L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 110g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Roewei61.5 T | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 34.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 19 hp more than AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Roewe i6 1.5 T and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Roewei61.5 T | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 169 hp 126 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 763 km 474 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 110 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Roewe i6 1.5 T | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 374 km (232 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























