Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180vsRoewe i6 1.5 T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRoewe i6
1.5 T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Most powerful169 hp126 kW
- Lightest1,270 kg2,800 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range763 km474 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 169hp126kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,270kg2,800lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | - |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 71.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 651km404mi Calculated | 763km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,595cc97cu in | 1,490cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,671mm184in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,835mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,555mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 92mm4in | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 467L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
- Roewe i6 1.5 T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5,600 rpm | 1,700-4,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Roewei61.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW |
Roewe i6 1.5 T has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Roewei61.5 T | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| Roewei61.5 T | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.3 s |
| Roewei61.5 T | 8.5 s |
Although Roewe i6 1.5 T has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Roewe i6 1.5 T: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 651 km 404 mi |
| Roewei61.5 T | 763 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Roewei61.5 T | 169 hp 126 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Roewei61.5 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Roewei61.5 T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Roewe i6 1.5 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Roewei61.5 T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Roewei61.5 T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | Roewei61.5 T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 169 hp 126 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 651 km 404 mi | 763 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 467 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 | Roewe i6 1.5 T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Roewe i6 1.5 T
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























