Car comparison

Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12vsRimac Nevera 120 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Zenvo Aurora Tur

6.6 V12

1250 hpGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2026-present
VS

Rimac Nevera

120 kWh

1914 hpElectricAWDCoupe2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12

  • Fastest top speed
    450 km/h
    280 mph
  • Lightest
    1,450 kg
    3,197 lb
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    96/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.0 s
  • Most powerful
    1,914 hp
    1,427 kW
  • Highest torque
    2,360 Nm
    1,741 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    890 hp/t
    664 kW/t
    1.1 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,250hp932kW
1,914hp1,427kW
Torque
1,700Nm1,254lb-ft
2,360Nm1,741lb-ft
Curb weight
1,450kg3,197lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
450 km/h
280 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
To 99% top speed
39.9s99% target: 446 km/h / 277 mph
Calculated
34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.3s
2.0s
0-200 km/h
5.3s
Calculated
4.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.2s
Calculated
1.9s
Calculated
Quarter mile
8.9s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
862hp/t643kW/t391hp/1000 lb
Calculated
890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
1,172Nm/t784lb-ft/ton
Calculated
1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,819mm190in
4,750mm187in
Width
2,020mm80in
1,986mm78in
Height
1,117mm44in
1,208mm48in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,745mm108in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12RimacNevera120 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.2 s
1.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.3 s
2.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
5.3 s
4.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
11.2 s
11.1 s
Top speed
450 km/h
280 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.5 s
330 ft
101 m
4.1 s
3.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.0 s
5.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.6 s
7.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.9 s
8.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
283 km/h
176 mph
284 km/h
176 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
1,250 hp
932 kW
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 664 hp more than Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 664 hp (495 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
1,700 Nm
1,254 lb-ft
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
RimacNevera120 kWh
2,150 kg
4,740 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
450 km/h
280 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
412 km/h
256 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V122.3 s
RimacNevera120 kWh2.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
862 hp/t
643 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
RimacNevera120 kWh
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
1,250 hp
932 kW
2.3 s
450 km/h
280 mph
RimacNevera120 kWh
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
2.0 s
412 km/h
256 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12
Power
1,250 hp
932 kW
0-100 km/h2.3 s
Top speed
450 km/h
280 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,819 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,117 mm
44.0 in
RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
0-100 km/h2.0 s
Top speed
412 km/h
256 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12RimacNevera120 kWh
Power
1,250 hp
932 kW
1,914 hp
1,427 kW
Torque
1,700 Nm
1,254 lb-ft
2,360 Nm
1,741 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.3 s
2.0 s
Top speed
450 km/h
280 mph
412 km/h
256 mph
Lightness
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
2,150 kg
4,740 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,819 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,117 mm
44.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,750 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,208 mm
47.6 in
Power-to-weight score
862 hp/t
643 kW/t
1.2 kg/hp
890 hp/t
664 kW/t
1.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12

  • Is 700 kg lighter
  • Has 38 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Rimac Nevera 120 kWh

  • Has 664 hp more
  • Has 660 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12 vs Rimac Nevera 120 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster