Zenvo Aurora Tur
Car comparison
Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12vsRimac Nevera 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRimac Nevera
120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12
- Fastest top speed450 km/h280 mph
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.0 s
- Most powerful1,914 hp1,427 kW
- Highest torque2,360 Nm1,741 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight890 hp/t664 kW/t1.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | RimacNevera120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,250hp932kW | 1,914hp1,427kW |
| Torque | 1,700Nm1,254lb-ft | 2,360Nm1,741lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 450 km/h 280 mph | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 39.9s99% target: 446 km/h / 277 mph Calculated | 34.3s99% target: 408 km/h / 253 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.3s | 2.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.3s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.2s Calculated | 1.9s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 8.9s Calculated | 8.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 862hp/t643kW/t391hp/1000 lb Calculated | 890hp/t664kW/t404hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 1,172Nm/t784lb-ft/ton Calculated | 1,098Nm/t734lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,819mm190in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 2,020mm80in | 1,986mm78in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,208mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,745mm108in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | RimacNevera120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.2 s | 1.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.3 s | 2.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.3 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 11.2 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | 450 km/h 280 mph | 412 km/h 256 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.1 s | 3.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.0 s | 5.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 283 km/h 176 mph | 284 km/h 176 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 1,250 hp 932 kW |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW |
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh has 664 hp more than Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12 and Rimac Nevera 120 kWh: 664 hp (495 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 1,700 Nm 1,254 lb-ft |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 450 km/h 280 mph |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 412 km/h 256 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 2.3 s |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 2.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Rimac Nevera 120 kWh and Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 862 hp/t 643 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | 1,250 hp 932 kW | 2.3 s | 450 km/h 280 mph |
| RimacNevera120 kWh | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | 2.0 s | 412 km/h 256 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RimacNevera120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ZenvoAurora Tur6.6 V12 | RimacNevera120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,250 hp 932 kW | 1,914 hp 1,427 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,700 Nm 1,254 lb-ft | 2,360 Nm 1,741 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.3 s | 2.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 450 km/h 280 mph | 412 km/h 256 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 862 hp/t 643 kW/t 1.2 kg/hp | 890 hp/t 664 kW/t 1.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Zenvo Aurora Tur 6.6 V12
- Is 700 kg lighter
- Has 38 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Rimac Nevera 120 kWh
- Has 664 hp more
- Has 660 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























