Renault Megane II Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsToyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Celica (T23)
1.8 i GT- R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk365 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 181Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | - |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.8s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,328mm170in |
| Width | - | 1,735mm68in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
- Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7,600 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 7,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.8 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW |
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 42 hp more than Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R and Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | 182 hp 136 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane II CoupeRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ToyotaCelica (T23)1.8 i GT- R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 181 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II Coupe RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 119 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Celica (T23) 1.8 i GT- R
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























