Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsRenault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Latitude
3.0 V6 dCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score88/100
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 28.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 972km604mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,897mm193in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,642mm104in | 2,762mm109in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,523mm60in | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 477L |
| Max trunk volume | 833L | 511L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 3,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW |
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi has 29 hp more than Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.6 s |
Although Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi has more power, Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 972 km 604 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI | RenaultLatitude3.0 V6 dCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 972 km 604 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI | Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Latitude 3.0 V6 dCi
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Has 17 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























