Car comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSIvsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011

2.0 TSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2011-2012
VS

Seat Exeo ST

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2009-2011

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.6 L/100 km
    24.5 mpg US
    29.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Largest trunk
    460 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSISeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
211hp157kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,990kg4,387lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
65.5s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
28.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,014km630mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,661mm184in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,772mm70in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,430mm56in
Wheelbase
2,642mm104in
2,642mm104in
Front track
1,522mm60in
1,522mm60in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,523mm60in
Trunk volume
460L
442L
Max trunk volume
833L
1,354L
Doors
4
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
159g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI4,600-6,000 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI5,700 rpm3,500 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSISeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
28.5 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
244 km/h
152 mph
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI7.1 s
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
1,014 km
630 mi
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.1 s
244 km/h
152 mph
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSISeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,661 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Range score
1,014 km
630 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
159 g/km
-
Trunk score
460 L
16.2 cu ft
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSISeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Exeo Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 60 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 18 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Exeo 2.0 TSI
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsSeatExeo ST2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.4 D5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolkswagenJetta VI2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.5 T5
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0 TSI
250 V6
VS
SeatExeoFacelift 20112.0 TSIvsLexusIS II (XE20)Facelift 2010250 V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 T
VS
SeatExeo ST2.0 TSIvsCadillacBLS Wagon2.0 T
Seat Exeo · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI vs Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster