Renault Safrane I (B54)
Car comparison
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)vsRenault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II
3.0 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful263 hp196 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range693 km431 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263hp196kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 693km431mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,963cc181cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,763mm188in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,429mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,766mm109in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,330L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 76L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) has 56 hp more than Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 667 km 414 mi |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 693 km 431 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp 196 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 693 km 431 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) | Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























