Renault Laguna II
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24VvsRenault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III Grandtour
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range985 km612 mi
- Largest trunk508 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 178hp133kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,613kg3,556lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.0s Calculated | 44.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | 985km612mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,803mm189in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,429mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 508L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,330L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.0 s | 44.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has 29 hp more than Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 213 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V and Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 693 km 431 mi |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 985 km 612 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 178 hp 133 kW | 8.7 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 178 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 213 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,613 kg 3,556 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | 985 km 612 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 508 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V | Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 29 hp more
- Is 108 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III Grandtour 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 95 Nm more
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 292 km (181 mi) more estimated range
- Has 78 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























