Renault Laguna II
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24VvsRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio II (PHASE III)
2.0 16V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Best estimated range693 km431 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lightest1,110 kg2,447 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 179hp133kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 200Nm148lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,110kg2,447lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.0s Calculated | 32.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | 617km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 3,811mm150in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,639mm65in |
| Height | 1,429mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,471mm97in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,418mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,392mm55in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 255L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,330L | 1,037L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 194g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 6,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.0 s | 32.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 179 hp 133 kW |
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has 28 hp more than Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 7.1 s |
Although Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has more power, Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 693 km 431 mi |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 617 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 179 hp 133 kW | 7.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 179 hp 133 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,110 kg 2,447 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | 617 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 194 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 255 L 9.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V | Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Has 175 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























