Renault Laguna Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsRenault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna II
3.0 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range825 km513 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 207hp154kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 285Nm210lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 1,923kg4,239lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 693km431mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,643mm183in | 4,576mm180in |
| Width | 1,811mm71in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,400mm55in | 1,429mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | - | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,480mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 423L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,330L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has 2 hp more than Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 7.8 s |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 8.1 s |
Although Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has more power, Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 825 km 513 mi |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 693 km 431 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.1 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo | RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 207 hp 154 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 693 km 431 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 423 L 14.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo | Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 2 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























