Car comparison

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna II

2.0 i 16V GT

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2005-2007
VS

Renault Clio II (PHASE III)

2.0 16V Sport

179 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Lightest
    1,110 kg
    2,447 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.3 L/100 km
    20.8 mpg US
    25.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
204hp152kW
179hp133kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
200Nm148lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,110kg2,447lb
Gross weight
1,950kg4,299lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
70.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
29.3s
Calculated
32.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
617km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,576mm180in
3,811mm150in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,639mm65in
Height
1,429mm56in
1,409mm55in
Wheelbase
2,740mm108in
2,471mm97in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,418mm56in
Rear track
1,480mm58in
1,392mm55in
Trunk volume
430L
255L
Max trunk volume
1,330L
1,037L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
50L
CO2 emissions-
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V SportPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport6,500 rpm5,250 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.3 s
32.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has 25 hp more than Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
200 Nm
148 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
1,110 kg
2,447 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT7.2 s
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport7.1 s

Although Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
7.2 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW
7.1 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
179 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
204 hp
152 kW
179 hp
133 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
200 Nm
148 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,110 kg
2,447 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in
Range score
-
617 km
384 mi
CO2 score
-
194 g/km
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 175 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 16V Sport
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 16V Sport
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Sport
3.0 V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT vs Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport - car comparison - FastVsFaster