Renault Safrane I (B54)
Car comparison
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)vsRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful263 hp196 kW
- Highest torque363 Nm268 lb-ft
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range682 km424 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 263hp196kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,963cc181cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,763mm188in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | - |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,766mm109in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,542mm61in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,487mm59in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 76L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 5,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) has 39 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 7.2 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
Although Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) has more power, Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545): 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 667 km 414 mi |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 682 km 424 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 263 hp 196 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultSafrane I (B54)3.0 Biturbo (B545) | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 263 hp 196 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545) | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Safrane I (B54) 3.0 Biturbo (B545)
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 63 Nm more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 320 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (9 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























