Car comparison

Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24VvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna II

3.0 V6 24V

207 hp2946 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedHatchback2001-2007
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

197 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,260 kg
    2,778 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    156 hp/t
    117 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.2 L/100 km
    19.3 mpg US
    23.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    207 hp
    154 kW
  • Highest torque
    285 Nm
    210 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    693 km
    431 mi
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
207hp154kW
197hp147kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,260kg2,778lb
Gross weight
1,980kg4,365lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
94.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
70.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
34.0s
Calculated
37.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
693km431mi
Calculated
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,946cc180cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,576mm180in
3,991mm157in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,429mm56in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,740mm108in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,370mm54in
Rear track
1,480mm58in
1,360mm54in
Ground clearance-
113mm4in
Trunk volume
430L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,330L
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24VRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V6,000 rpm3,750 rpm6,250 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,550 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.0 s
37.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
92 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
207 hp
154 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
197 hp
147 kW

Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has 10 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,260 kg
2,778 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V8.1 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

Although Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V has more power, Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
693 km
431 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
618 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
207 hp
154 kW
8.1 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
197 hp
147 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
Power
207 hp
154 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
197 hp
147 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
8.1 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24V
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
207 hp
154 kW
197 hp
147 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,260 kg
2,778 lb
Fuel consumption
10.1 L/100 km
23.3 mpg US
28.0 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
693 km
431 mi
618 km
384 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
156 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24VRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.68 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.45 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,651 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 142 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6 24V
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6 24V
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
3.0 V6 24V
3.0 V6 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
3.0 V6 24V
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
3.0 V6 24V
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
3.0 V6 24V
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II3.0 V6 24VvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Renault Laguna II 3.0 V6 24V vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster