Renault Clio III (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio III (PHASE I)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Highest torque215 Nm159 lb-ft
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range671 km417 mi
- Largest trunk288 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201hp150kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 215Nm159lb-ft | 215Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,204kg2,654lb | 1,260kg2,778lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 37.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 618km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,017mm158in | 3,991mm157in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | 2,585mm102in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,370mm54in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,360mm54in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 113mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 288L | 288L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,038L | 1,028L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 7,100 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 7,250 rpm | 5,550 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 37.1 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 197 hp 147 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 4 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 671 km 417 mi |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 618 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp 150 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 618 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V | Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























