Car comparison

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna III

2.0 dCi FAP

173 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2007-2010
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
173hp129kW
200hp149kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,567kg3,455lb
1,240kg2,734lb
Gross weight
2,042kg4,502lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
98.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
45.0s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,015km631mi
Calculated
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,695mm185in
3,991mm157in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,756mm109in
2,585mm102in
Front track-
1,520mm60in
Rear track-
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume
470L
288L
Max trunk volume-
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
66L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,500 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.0 s
36.8 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
173 hp
129 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V has 27 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 27 hp (20 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,240 kg
2,734 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
220 km/h
137 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP8.7 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,015 km
631 mi
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
618 km
384 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
173 hp
129 kW
8.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
173 hp
129 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
173 hp
129 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.7 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
173 hp
129 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,015 km
631 mi
618 km
384 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 165 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 397 km (247 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 182 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Has 27 hp more
  • Is 327 kg lighter
  • Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster