Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I)
Car comparison
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6vsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio III (PHASE I)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range618 km384 mi
- Largest trunk288 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful226 hp169 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 226hp169kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 215Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km338mi Calculated | 618km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,800mm150in | 3,991mm157in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,360mm54in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,511mm99in | 2,585mm102in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 65L | 288L |
| Max trunk volume | 110L | 1,028L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 7,250 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 226 hp 169 kW |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6 has 26 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 6.4 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6 and Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 545 km 338 mi |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 618 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 226 hp 169 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 226 hp 169 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 338 mi | 618 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 65 L 2.3 cu ft | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6 | Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio Sport (PHASE I) 3.0 V6
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Has 223 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























