Car comparison

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna II

2.0 i 16V GT

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2005-2007
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE I)

RS 2.0 16V

200 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.7 L/100 km
    20.1 mpg US
    24.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,240kg2,734lb
Gross weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
69.4s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
29.3s
Calculated
36.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
618km384mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,576mm180in
3,991mm157in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,429mm56in
1,477mm58in
Wheelbase
2,740mm108in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,480mm58in
1,520mm60in
Trunk volume
430L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,330L
1,028L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V7,250 rpm5,500 rpm7,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.3 s
36.8 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has 4 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
1,240 kg
2,734 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT7.2 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

Although Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
7.2 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
200 hp
149 kW
6.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
3,991 mm
157.1 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Range score
-
618 km
384 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 85 Nm more
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 142 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V

  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT vs Renault Clio III (PHASE I) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster