Car comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurbovsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna Coupe

2.0 16V Turbo

205 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCoupe2008-2012
VS

Renault Laguna III

2.0 dCi FAP

173 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2007-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    470 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    205 hp
    153 kW
  • Lightest
    1,503 kg
    3,314 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    102 kW/t
    7.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
205hp153kW
173hp129kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,503kg3,314lb
1,567kg3,455lb
Gross weight
1,923kg4,239lb
2,042kg4,502lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
98.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
98.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
33.7s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
1,015km631mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,643mm183in
4,695mm185in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,400mm55in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,756mm109in
Trunk volume
423L
470L
Doors
2
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.7 s
45.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
173 hp
129 kW

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo has 32 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,567 kg
3,455 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo7.8 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
825 km
513 mi
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,015 km
631 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
205 hp
153 kW
7.8 s
236 km/h
147 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
173 hp
129 kW
8.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
173 hp
129 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
Power
205 hp
153 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
173 hp
129 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurboRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
205 hp
153 kW
173 hp
129 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.7 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,503 kg
3,314 lb
1,567 kg
3,455 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
423 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,643 mm
182.8 in
Height
1,400 mm
55.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
1,015 km
631 mi
Trunk score
423 L
14.9 cu ft
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V TurboRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Is 64 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 47 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.0 dCi FAP
3.0 dCi V6 FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe3.0 dCi V6 FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.0 16V Turbo
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V TurbovsRenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V
Renault Laguna Coupe 2.0 16V Turbo vs Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP - car comparison - FastVsFaster