Renault Laguna II
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna III
2.0 dCi FAP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score53/100
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 173hp129kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,042kg4,502lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 98.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,015km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,576mm180in | 4,695mm185in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,811mm71in |
| Height | 1,429mm56in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,756mm109in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | - |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,330L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 3,750 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW |
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has 31 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 7.2 s |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | 173 hp 129 kW | 8.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT | RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 173 hp 129 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,015 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
- Has 31 hp more
- Is 247 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























